How to choose a network for a deal - Ethereum, Base, Polygon or BNB Chain
A comparison of Coin-Trust networks by security, fees, tokens and speed. How to pick a network for the deal amount and the mistakes beginners make when choosing.
In this article
One escrow contract works on four networks, and its address is the same everywhere: 0x6462DDDc0a3D893A7C17f94410e2d27162a390aD. Why - in the article on CREATE2. But the networks are not equal: they differ in fees, tokens and level of security. The choice of network is the first decision when creating a deal, and it must be agreed with the counterparty.
The four networks in brief
| Network | Chain ID | Type | Main coin | Fees |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ethereum | 1 | main network (L1) | ETH | higher, from fractions of a dollar to tens |
| Base | 8453 | Layer 2 (optimistic rollup) | ETH | very low |
| Polygon | 137 | separate PoS network | POL | very low |
| BNB Chain | 56 | Binance's separate network | BNB | low |
Ethereum
Pros: maximum security and decentralisation, the greatest liquidity and the widest choice of tokens. The foundation of the whole ecosystem.
Cons: fees. A simple action at busy hours can cost several dollars, and the several actions in a deal (create, accept, confirm) multiply this.
Suits: large amounts, when a fee of tens of dollars is a small share of the sum and maximum reliability matters.
Base
Pros: low fees and speed. It is a Layer 2 on top of Ethereum, and its security rests on the main network. Popular, with plenty of USDC.
Cons: dependence on the network operator (the sequencer); withdrawal to Ethereum takes up to a week through the standard bridge.
Suits: most small and mid-sized deals.
Polygon
Pros: very cheap transactions, has run for a long time, supported by many wallets and services.
Cons: security rests on its own validator set, not directly on Ethereum. Fees are paid in POL, which you must have on the balance.
Suits: small deals, especially between people already working on this network.
BNB Chain
Pros: low fees, many users from the Binance ecosystem, easy top-up from the exchange.
Cons: the network is relatively centralised: the validator set is limited. Fees are in BNB. An important technical feature: many tokens have a different number of decimals here (for example USDT has 18 decimals, whereas on Ethereum it has 6). The interface accounts for this, but manual operations are error-prone (more on decimals).
Suits: deals between Binance users and small amounts.
How to choose: three questions
- What amount? The larger the deal, the less the fee matters and the more security matters. A rough rule: the network fee should not exceed a few tenths of a percent of the amount.
- Where do the parties have money and gas? There is no point choosing a network in which the counterparty has neither the token nor the coin for gas. Moving funds means a bridge with its risks.
- Which token is needed? Not every token exists on every network. Check that the stablecoin you need is available on the chosen network (about stablecoins).
An example of choosing
A freelancer and a client agree on a 400 USDC project. The client has USDC on an exchange that withdraws to Base with a minimal fee. The contractor has a MetaMask wallet without ETH. A sensible choice is Base: the deal will cost a few cents, and the contractor needs only a tiny ETH balance to confirm.
Another example: buying a car for 25,000 USDT with a guarantor. Here a 20-dollar fee on Ethereum is under 0.1% of the amount. The parties choose the main network for maximum reliability.
Typical mistakes
- Sent the token on the wrong network. The money went to an address on Polygon while the counterparty expects it on Base. Check the network before every operation.
- No coin for gas. The tokens are there, but there is no ETH, POL or BNB on the needed network - a transaction is impossible.
- Mixed up tokens. USDC on one network and USDC on another are different contracts (why).
- Did not agree on the network. The deal was created on one network while the other side looks for it on another.
What to read next
Find out what a fee is made of: fees by example. Or study safe wallet handling: the checklist.
Keep reading
- 2 · Practice
Coin-Trust fees by example - how much you pay and to whom
A breakdown of the service fees: the 1% platform fee, the guarantor's rate (base and dispute) and gas. Tables for every deal outcome on a 1000 USDC example.
4 min read - 2 · Practice
Bridges between networks - how assets are moved and why it is the riskiest place
How blockchain bridges work (lock-and-mint, liquidity pools), how a native bridge differs from a third-party one, the known hacks and how to move money more safely.
3 min read
Mentioned in
- Bitcoin vs Ethereum - the difference and why deals are built on Ethereum
- Where escrow is used - 10 real-life scenarios with examples
- Glossary - blockchain, wallets, smart contracts and escrow from A to Z
- The deal lifecycle - from offer to payout, step by step
- Network fees (gas), L1 and L2: which network to choose for a deal
- Layer 2 and rollups - how Ethereum became cheaper and faster
- Bridges between networks - how assets are moved and why it is the riskiest place
- Coin-Trust fees by example - how much you pay and to whom
- Use case - a 1,500 USDC freelance project paid by stages
- Use case - selling a physical item with delivery through escrow
- Signatures in Ethereum - ECDSA, ecrecover, personal_sign and EIP-712
- Gas optimization in Solidity - 12 techniques and when they apply
- EIP-1559 - how the Ethereum fee market works (base fee, tips and burning)
- Proof of Stake and finality - how Ethereum agrees on blocks
- Rollups under the hood - batches, fraud proofs, ZK, blobs and withdrawals
- Account abstraction (ERC-4337) - smart wallets, gas sponsorship and access recovery
Ready to try it?
Create your first deal in a couple of minutes. The money is locked in a smart contract and paid out by rules you can see in advance.

